"I am trying to convert Hindus back to Hindu religion and that will stop Hindus getting converted to other religions." -- Swami Chinmayananda
Dr Gopalakrishnan on Zakir Naik
21/02/2012 23:42:53  http://www.youtube.com/user/iishtv





Share on Facebook



 
  
pran
14/04/2014 00:50:56
zakir naik
visit www.alisina.com
How many times they invited Zakir to debate Dr.Ali Sina the great scholar of Islam and humanity. But he couldn't.
PLEASE THINK!!!!
pran
14/04/2014 00:50:56
zakir naik
visit www.alisina.com
How many times they invited Zakir to debate Dr.Ali Sina the great scholar of Islam and humanity. But he couldn't.
PLEASE THINK!!!!
fareedha
08/01/2014 06:02:40
as evidence
respectd sir,

do u know the meaning of RABB,
creator.. he is not born & nvr giv birth...

LAM YALIDH VALAM YOOLADH


so plz dont manipulate the words.. if u r ready go and join in the mass of audience, and ask ur questions against our ZAKIR SIR . And thus show ur knowledge bravely
patavara radhakrishnan
19/11/2013 01:02:14
Hindava Keralam
This speech to be translated in all Indian Language...
sanatana
22/08/2013 21:07:46
Reply
By discussing about this MBBS doctor are we not waisting our time ? he has only one book just like we all had at kinder garten
which taught us nusrey rihmes and A,B,C,D he is an imbecile who will also expalin "in english language Alphabet Number one "A" for Allah "B" Burkha K for "Kafir"
he will go to the extent of saying in english Alphabet word no 1(2) ,word no 12(2) word no 8
all refers about allah Logic word no1 A No12 LL word no 1 A all refers about ALLAH you countermand saying you can identfy Vishnu similarly he will say V comes last A for allah comes first .Sanatana or hindhu form of worship/life has survived time and cultures it allows you tremnedous freedom with the Goal ultimate aim of the faith is Moksha mukti getting back to were we all belong you call it the paramathma vishnu ,krishna,shiva prabhama etc etc to get released from the birth rebirth cycle not geting a passport to heaven were your carnal desires can be satisfied by 10000 houries virgins and honey etc manmade beliefs always associate rewards with physical worldly object the true test of any faith is its acceptance by7 free will free mind not by comparitive criticism . forget about him and his Piss TV lets use our intellect for some meaning full purpose Lokha samastha sukino bhavanthu . dhanyavad
Sreeraj
14/08/2012 00:16:20
@majeed
Majeed,

This is your problem. You musleems will not accept any truth. Just blindly believing you are true. There are lot of mistakes in Quran. Just use google search to find it. But I am sure you are not going to do it, because you are a musleem.. so bindly beliving.
majeed
01/06/2012 05:49:47
UR TALK IS WASTE in front ZAKIR
U DONT KNOW ABOUT RELEGION ? WHAT RIGHT U TO TELL ABOUT RELEGION.i challenge you to PROVE
quran is not frm one god that is allah through muhammed.can any scient can prove one mistake frm quran......?
Abu Ahzab
27/03/2012 04:19:31
Looks like you have a reply
Looks like you have a reply, but the video is very slow..
Akash
18/03/2012 02:20:41
Congrats to translator
Reall good..Hats off to Satyan who translated it so Zakir wishes he can read..
kiran
17/03/2012 09:52:44
speech
I would like to watch this speech in English in U Tube.
Satyan
17/03/2012 06:00:17
Zakir and the likes
The count of the likes of Zakir are many. Their followers are innumerable. Networking Sites are being used by such followers to depict Islam as the Only True religion with help from Videos Posted on YouTube.
As it is said, To know anything better, you should get to the root of it. Similarly to Understand Islam, it has to be explored in detail. To begin with 'Understanding Muhammad' by Ali Sina is the best route.

PDF format is available at
http://www.4shared.com/office/1CEsiwnz/Ali_Sina_-_Understanding_Muham.html

.........
Let's Wake Up !!
Prem
15/03/2012 03:59:35
zakir naik fool
He is a moron. I have seen a query put to him on why Muslims don't eat pork?

His answer was "Pig is the only animal who invites other pigs to share their wives". Do you feel this is a scholarly answer?
Satyan
11/03/2012 21:12:38
Translation - 8 Concluding part
that is when problems are born in the world. This is exactly what Swami Vivekananda had said.
A frog residing in a well says that the frog that came from the ocean knows nothing. This frog jumps here and there in the well and asks the Other frog,

if the Ocean is as large as this well ? To this the frog from the Ocean replied: If you need to know about the Ocean, you must enter the ocean. Staying

here you will not be able to understand, O Frog !... This is what needs to be conveyed to Zakir Naik.
Therefore, Instead of staying in the well and proclaiming that this well is bigger than the ocean, you need good learning. If you ask anyone what a

particular line No. from a particular chapter of a particular states, Nobody can answer. If I ask which is the 5th line on the 327th page of the Novel

'Coir' by Thakazi Siva Sankara Pillai, would you be able to answer ? If I ask what is the 5th word on the 278th page of Oxford Dictionary, Can you

provide an answer ? Lets assume I say that in the 14th Chapter of Quran, the 2nd line says that you should not love anybody. Will you be able to examine

it ? Now who is going to verify it ? when there are thousands of people in the audience who is hearing the speech, maybe one or two of them might turn

to that page to take a look if its really what you said. It is quite possible that by the time the person turns up to the page, the very said statement

could be forgotten. This is not how a Challenge is offerred. To make others known after knowing for himself is how a Challenge is offered. The true

Knowledgeable one's goal is not to establish something, those are the signs of Politicians. Knowledge filled Scholars should give knowledge for

acceptance. Shankaracharya and Vivekananda did just that.
Just by wearing a tie and speaking anything into a mike with closed fists, and getting a huge round of applause from a thousand audience does not make
one a Pandit.

With this I end my words.
Satyan
11/03/2012 21:11:07
Translation - 7
Its not God's duty to write mantras. Its not God's duty to say that I should be praised, I should be honoured, You should not worship any other God

other than me, You can gain entry to heaven only through me. Such should not be said by any God. Such are the statements of Politicians. I should be

made the PM, I should be made the CM, You should not elect anybody else other than me. If God falls to such a low level like a Politician, it is a

mistake if it said in any Bible or by any Hindu God.
Therefore, with a little more larger heart, getting some more education, and instead of trying to debate and win, trying to know and letting others know

is what the likes of Zakir Naik needs to do. By debating and winning what can be accomplished ? Is it to let know that Islam is the religion of the

World ? I can say in a very Simple language. Today, it needs to be seen whether America, England and Canada has accepted Islam as the so called Language

of love ?
In my recent visit to America, I came to hear about a statement. Around 67 or 72 people were given Pilot Training. Later on they came to know this batch

had a Muslim having an American Name. All the 72 people were terminated. Just because there was a Muslim person, all the 72 people's training was

cancelled and were sent back. Why does the world fear the so called religion of Love, Mercy and Truth ? This also needs to be given a thought. I have no hatred to any religion. I conduct classes in Churches aS well as Masjids. But, if anybody ( Including me) says that my religion is the biggest

and my religion is only Good, it is Wrong. I also should not say so. There are good things in every religion. The words of all the Rishis, Prophets and

Saints have good words. But when you say, you must follow only my religion, the path to heaven is only through me and following other paths would take
you to hell, and try to increase the count of your religion and that my religion is the religion that drives the world,
Satyan
11/03/2012 21:09:51
Translation - 6
What they have Studied is not Vedas, Puranas, Itihaasas, Darshanas, Upavedas or Upaanganas. These are not their line of Study as well. Zakir Naik

despite who's line of Study being different, and having no Knowledge about Ramayana, Mahabharata or Vedas, keeps delivering terrific speeches to the

audience and throws Questions at the audience, Which has no meaning.
One thing is sure, the thief can choose any path to flee, which is happenig now, but the Police can only follow the path of the thief, because Police

has their limitations. The reason is that they do not have Ceremonial rituals, they have knowledge limited to their zone of activities. Had there been

only one book it could have been easier to comment. But commenting on Hindu Dharma Scriptures comprising of around 2000 granthas, around 10000 vyakhanas

and around 1 Lakh Upakhyanas is very difficult.
Zakir further states that the Quran given by God for the people of the world. But, I say, the Vedas are not given by God. Itihasas are not given by God.

Puranas are also not given by God. Persons having Godly blessing wrote these to resolve the Problems of man. It clearly states about the Rishis who had

insights to deeper Knowledge. Rishis having Immense knowledge, Immense capability and Immense ideas and Shastras. Rishis who were scholars have

themselves handwritten these Vedas, Puranas and Itihasas. These Puranas and Vedas were Not by somebody who had no knowledge or education. That also

should be Understood. What they obtained as a result of Penance and Meditating, came as messages in the Vedas. Each Mantra in the Veda has the name of

the Rishi above it. If you see the Rig Veda or Yajur Veda, the Gayatri Mantra was written by Gaatino Vishwamitra Rishi Devi Gayatri Chanda Mitro Devata.

Gaatino Vishwamitra Rishi wrote it in 24 letters, Gayatri Mantra is chanted in praise describing the Sun. Therefore, Mantras were not written by God, Gods don't write Mantras.
Satyan
11/03/2012 21:07:23
Translation - 5
Can it be possible that one person can deliver all this knowledge ? Can a book written in one time period be used

in all the time periods ?
Should he feel proud of having just one Book, or should be hang his head in shame that he has only one book? This is what need to be thought about.
Haindava People have around 2000 Granthas. around 10000 Vyakhyanas, around 1 Lakh Upakhyanas. That's not all. Several of these are being rewritten with

additions, deletions and modifications.
Like this Zakir Naik in another You tube Video says, Mahabharata initially contained only 8000 Shlokas, then it became 24000, Now see, it has become 100

thousand. Who gave him this knowledge ? which book says that Mahabharata has only 8000 shlokas ? Does it become True if he says so ? Mahabharata had

1,25,000 then and it still has. Even then he has stated that there are 100 thousand shlokas. One who does not even know the count of Shlokas in the

Mahabharata, is giving a terrific speech in high speed English ' 100 thousand Shlokas are there.. Corruption has taken place'. There's a saying in

Malayalam. He who knows nothing, he who speaks the loudest and he who has the last word wins. If Zakir Naik is trying to debate and win, shouldn't he go

about describing point by point ? When jumping around with a point from here and a point from there, in an attenpt to silence the audience, Remember,

Such baseless and meaningless barks would not hold any ground when faced by someone who is well knowledged and Capable.
Similarly, he states that he has defeated Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in a conversation. Be it Ravi Shankar, Mata Amritanandamayi or Sri Satya Sai Baba, they

are humans like us. They are those who eliminate the pains of sorrows of mankind. They are not Scholars in all the Ancient Granthas of Bharat, Mata

Amritanandamayi has hardly studied upto 4th grade. Bhagwan Satya Sai Baba has only studied upto 8th grade. Sri Sri Ravi Shankar is a B.Tech.
Satyan
11/03/2012 21:06:10
Translation - 4
If at all anyone enters Ka-ba, then his head will roll on the ground then and there. If Quran is all Universal, then why are Hindus and Christians not

allowed entry into Mecca during Haj or in other times ? Shouldn't this also be looked into ?
Then he says that Ramanujan has stated there are 320 Ramayanas. Ramanujan is the author of 'Vishishta Adhvaitam'. He has not mentioned or written about

'Ramayana'. Ramayana is not the Subject of Ramanujan. Then how can Ramanujan speak about 'Ramayana' ? With an ignorant audience, Zakir Naik felt that

since both the words 'Ramanujan' and 'Ramayana' had the word 'Rama' in common, he could easily fool them to believe just by uttering 'Ramanujan'. What a

folly !! Isn't there a limit to the extent how much a man can be fooled ? What relation does Ramanujam who authored 'Vishishta Adhvaitam' and 'Ramayana'

have ? Since the audience does not know that there is no relation between these two, anything can be said.
He further says there are 320 Ramayanasm but only one Quran. Zakir Naik is mistaken. There are 320 Ramayanas in Malayalam, 410 Ramayanas in Tamil,

around 500 Ramayanas in Telugu. There are innumberable Ramayanas across Bharat. What is the reason for so many Ramayanas ? Some are the abridged

versions of Ramayana, Some are the Commentaries of Ramayana, Some are only the stories of Ramayana. Every Language has a Ramayana with explanations.
In the recent past, Kerala Sahitya Academy was awarded to a Person who has written a book on Ramayana. That also is a Ramayana. Having several Ramayanas is what can be termed as Capacity. Capacity is not when you have just one Book. Lets assume I say, Im a Ph. D. in Bio-Chemistry. I also say there is only one Book on Bio Chemistry. What a mistake ! and if I thereafter say that there

should be just One Bio-Chemistry Book in the world. Isn't that a bigger mistake ? Can it be possible that one book can contain all the information that
is required for the entire mankind ?
Satyan
11/03/2012 21:04:21
Translation - 3
As per Vedic stream of thought, the entire Universe is worshipped in the form of God. The reference of line No. 13 in Chapter 32 of Yajur Veda is not at all related to Idol Worship. Not just that. Be it Rig Veda, Sama Veda, Yajur Veda or Atharva Veda, No where is there any mention of Idol worship. Due to the lack of knowledge of those present in the audience, his later admitting that there is no mention of Idol worship becomes his self Knowledge. If at all the Yajur Veda states that Idol worship should not be performed, then is it not enough that Yajur Veda be worshiped ? Why is the Quran Worshipped ? As per him Yajur Veda says so. If it is so, then doesn't that leave us with a Question, why is then Quran being worshipped ? Not just that, he further states that this Veda also mentions about Allahu. By just altering a 2 letter word and making it sound as Allahu, and delivering a high Volume speech with super speed and in a manner that cannot be understood by anybody, does that establish that Yajur Veda has mention of Allahu ? This is an absolute Lie. Why is Allahu, Muhammad Nabi and Quran being preached with such false information ?
He then further states that Quran is all Universal. If it is all Universal, then aren't the Shias, SUnnis, Ahmedias and Sufis constantly at war with each other ? I sometimes ask some Muslims. In Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Irag and other muslim countries, muslims are the ones who manufacture bombs, muslims are the ones who explodes them, and most of the time the explosions take place in Mosques. If Muhammad Nabi is one, Quran is one, Prophet is one, the Moon and Star is one, Mecca is one, then why are they bombing and killing each other ? Not only that, If Quran is all Universal and for everybody, then why are Christians and Hindus not allowed entry into Mecca and Ka-aba ? Hindus and Christians can only reach upto a distance of 22 miles away.
Satyan
11/03/2012 21:01:54
Translation - 2
If by delivering screaming speeches without any knowledge, Someone like Zakir Naik offers a Challenge, Can such mistakes be put straight ?
Then in another instance he states that the Vedas were written only for Hindus, and Quran was written for the entire mankind, If that is so, then why the remaining population of the world of 703 crores, of which only 140 Crores of Muslims are not accepting Quran ? Not just that. If this Quran is for everyone, then why is it said in Quran, that you will come closer to Allahu when you behead those who donot Worship or praise Allahu ? If Quran is for everyone then why were the heads of those who did not praise Allahu dismembered ? The Muslim Invaders who Invaded Bharat since 995 A.D. killed Crores of Hindus. If this Quran was for the entire mankind, then wasn't it enough that they were also taught about Quran without killing them ? Why were they killed ? Why did the Invaders fight so many wars ? Were not these wars waged to make them forcefully accept the Quran ? Is there a statement anywhere in Quran that equals in meaning to 'Loka Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu' ? which means Let there be Wellness to everyone in the entire World. This mantra does NOT state that only the worshippers of Maha Vishnu should be all Well. Whereas, Quran says well being is only for those who worship Allahu. So, if the Quran was meant for the entire mankind, then the entire world has not yet accepted it.
Not just that. He further states, that the 13th line in Chapter 32 of Yajur Veda states that Idol Worship should not be performed. Which Yajurveda is he referring to ? Does Zakir Naik know there are how many Yajur Vedas ? Yajur Veda has 108 extensions or branches. Just by saying that Yajur Veda says so, to an audience of thousands of Muslims, they are made to get a false impression that Zakir Naik is a Scholar in Yajur Veda. His statement is without any knowledge of Yajur Veda.
Satyan
11/03/2012 20:58:17
Translation - 1
With a Lot of excitement, and to conquer the audience, without even offering them a moment to think about, in the presence of thousands of Muslims, making them to applaud, and to create an impression that he knows everything about Hindu Dharma, I felt amazing at how he he conducts a speech just by cheat, deceit and treachery.
He says, Krishna may have been born, maybe not, But Allahu exists. Let me ask a simple Question. Sri Krishna born in Mathura, brought up in Vrindavan, and a prosperous City built in Dwarka, Cambridge University and S.R. Rao Senior Scientist of NIO - Goa, ( Natioanal Institute of Oceanography ), has proved it Archeologically. Such an Universally accepted proven fact of Sri Krishna, may have been born, may not and that Allahu exists is being said with confirmation. If that is so, doesn't that give rise to a Question ? ... Where was Allahu born ? Where did Allahu live ? If he is still existing, where is his existence ? What are the Scientific evidences to these ? Aren't these Questions Answerable ?
Secondly he says, there was no God prior to Allahu, no other God than Allahu at present and there will not be another God other than Allahu. In that case, is Allahu someone who becomes, exists and ceases to exist ? So as Zakir Naik states this, lets assume a Christian states that there was no God before Jehova and there will not be any God after Jehova. Lets also assume a Hindu states that there was no God before Maha Vishnu and that there will not be another God after Maha Vishnu. Aren't all three of them at liberty to state so ?
Chandran
04/03/2012 10:41:49
A Fitting Reply to an Ignorant Fool
Sir, you must engage in a debate with that Joker Zakir Naik in front of all his supporters and media as a reply to all these years of hindu bashing.In our society, knowledgeable people like you should come forward to save our self respect and reply to such nonsense with clear, logical and scientific arguments.
Pranamam Dr.Gopalakrishnan!
Nene
04/03/2012 02:10:44
Translation of Dr. Gopala Krishnan's Speech PART 2
(6)
About the existence of a large number of (320) Ramayanas, Dr Gopala Krishnan says, "This once again proves Zakir's igorance. These are not 320 Ramayanas but texts elaborating on different aspects of The Ramayana. It is so deep a subject that each facet needs explanation by means of a different text book.

(7) Zakir says his book is God's direct message to all mankind and written by God. Dr. Gopala Krishnan replies. " The Vedas are not written by God, but written by wise Rishis and Sages of India as a means to expel ignorance of the human mind, to help them see through the darkness and realize God. And that the Vedas are subject to Human logic, unlike Quran. They can be questioned and subjected to Scientific evidence. No body will be punished for questioning it. So which is more Real, logical and Scientific.

(8) Just by shouting themselves hoarse before an audience that comprises of ignorant muslim followers, you cannot expect to deface the Vedas or the Hindu religious philosophy.

(9) No God insists that " You should ONLY worship ME. Only a politician will say that. So do not downgrade God to the status of a politician.

10) A frog who reised in a well, and has not seen the Ocean will scream and shout that His Well is the biggest place in the Universe. Zakir Naik is like that frog. He has only seen his little world, and his Religious text. There are bigger greater Religions and Religious Texts beyond the boundaries of his limited Knowledge. Please try to learn with an open mind. Then hopefully your ignorant aggression will give way to peace and better understanding..."

Dr. Goplala Krishnan concludes.
Nene
04/03/2012 01:40:04
Translation of Dr. Gopala Krishnan's Speeck
Dear Brother Raj,

I will attempt to translate the speech. Dr. Gopalakrishnan's counter arguments are follows.

(1)Zakir Naik questions existence Lord Krishna's while attempting to declare the existence of something called Allahu. He asks is there a proof of Lord Krishna's existence.

Dr. GopalaKrishnan proceeds to answer him. "Yes I will provide proof of Lord Krishna's existence. You only have to examine the study conducted by Cambridge University of UK and National Institute of Oceanography, Goa. Their combined team has located and identified the remains of a Great City called Dwaraka built by Lord Krishna who was born in a place called Mathura and lived in Brindavan. Now that is Scientific
Proof... Now Mr. Zakir Naik, since you started the argument, could you provide a similar proof or Archeological evidence of Allahu's existence? So which is unreal. Which is real?

(2) You say Quran is for the whole world. Then why does the majority of global population reject it?

(3) If Quran's appeal is global, why did you have to massacre millions of Hindus when Islamic Mughals and Turks attacked India in the name of Islam? Does you religion not ask you to strike off the heads of people who believe in other Gods. So he is "your God" and "yours alone". Which means Allahu doesn't belong to the whole creation. Please understand the difference

(3) Let us listen to what the Vedas say "Lokaha Samasthaha Sukhino Bhavanthu". May the whole creation Be well and happy. It doesn't ask you to kill non believers...!! So which is Universal love?

(4)If your religion is true, why do you have to promote it with BLATANT LIES about Yajur Veda? There is no mention of Allahu's name in Yajur Veda?

5) There is no connection between 'Ramanujan' and Ramayanam. Ramanujan has not mentioned a word about Ramayanam.This shows Zakir Naik knows nothing about Ramanujan, Ramayanam or Hinduism. He is speaking to ignorant muslims who believe is very well informed.
Nene
04/03/2012 01:40:04
Translation of Dr. Gopala Krishnan's Speeck
Dear Brother Raj,

I will attempt to translate the speech. Dr. Gopalakrishnan's counter arguments are follows.

(1)Zakir Naik questions existence Lord Krishna's while attempting to declare the existence of something called Allahu. He asks is there a proof of Lord Krishna's existence.

Dr. GopalaKrishnan proceeds to answer him. "Yes I will provide proof of Lord Krishna's existence. You only have to examine the study conducted by Cambridge University of UK and National Institute of Oceanography, Goa. Their combined team has located and identified the remains of a Great City called Dwaraka built by Lord Krishna who was born in a place called Mathura and lived in Brindavan. Now that is Scientific
Proof... Now Mr. Zakir Naik, since you started the argument, could you provide a similar proof or Archeological evidence of Allahu's existence? So which is unreal. Which is real?

(2) You say Quran is for the whole world. Then why does the majority of global population reject it?

(3) If Quran's appeal is global, why did you have to massacre millions of Hindus when Islamic Mughals and Turks attacked India in the name of Islam? Does you religion not ask you to strike off the heads of people who believe in other Gods. So he is "your God" and "yours alone". Which means Allahu doesn't belong to the whole creation. Please understand the difference

(3) Let us listen to what the Vedas say "Lokaha Samasthaha Sukhino Bhavanthu". May the whole creation Be well and happy. It doesn't ask you to kill non believers...!! So which is Universal love?

(4)If your religion is true, why do you have to promote it with BLATANT LIES about Yajur Veda? There is no mention of Allahu's name in Yajur Veda?

5) There is no connection between 'Ramanujan' and Ramayanam. Ramanujan has not mentioned a word about Ramayanam.This shows Zakir Naik knows nothing about Ramanujan, Ramayanam or Hinduism. He is speaking to ignorant muslims who believe is very well informed.
raj
01/03/2012 06:02:14
good
Dear Sir,
God bless you.
I don't understand malayalam but still tried to grasp what you are saying....wish someone publish this speach in english so everyone can read and understand and know how much shit is filled in zakir naik's head.....most of hindu scholars live in south and their speach should be translated in hindi and english so across India hindus can understand.

As zakir naik is not just problem to kerala but he is problem to entire India and as well entire world.
He is trying to glorify the misdeeds of muslims.
He says they can many n number of females as there are more females on earth...but world senses show no of girl babies born even in western countries are less...
he says osama is not terrorist.
He says lord shiva is not god.
He says christ is not god....if no religion gods are gods for him then my question that fool is can he show his god?

God bless you Gopalakrishnan sir....I could get summary of your speach though I didnt understand everything.
I'm a north Indian and wish to see someone translate your speach.

Also people like you should be recognised across India and your speech should be made available to all hindus across globe.

There are diamonds like you born in hindu religion but we hindus hardly identify dimonds like you.

Let lord shiva give good health and long life to spread the knowledge.


With respectful regards
Raj
mathew
29/02/2012 09:07:42
to a.k
@ a.k., Dr. G rightly speaks about and condemn the religious absolutism of the semi-literate Dr(?)Naik. But as someone who follows Dr. G's writings and speeches, I find he himself sometimes veering towards that very tendency. That is what I meant by the 3%. Sometimes I find negative complexes and animosities that drive people like our semi-literate also drive learned people like Dr.G. I do not want to elaborate on this topic and create a controversy here.

Having said that, I liked this speech by Dr G., and congratulate him for a clear exposition of ideas.
vinod kumar
28/02/2012 04:37:04
comment on dr .gopalakrishnan
It is fantastic to see there are some Pundits like you to defend the the collapsing hinduism by the on slaught of people like zakeer naik.Why this jihadi is still keeping the hindu tail of Naik with his name ?Give maximum propaganda to Dr.Gopalakrishnans prabhashanam.It is more interesting than boring interpretation classes on Vedas and Upanishads. There is some thrill and enthusiasm in hearing such talks where jihadis like Naiks are attacked. Please spread it to all India level
Ravindran P.K.
25/02/2012 11:50:46
Insecure faith
Please, see Mr. Ravi Lavda's post in the blog:http://dharmicpledge.blogspot.com/2011/03/sama-veda-connection-round-3.html

Mr. Lavda is right in saying that when a religion of 'ism' is lacking 'own stuff' to convince people, they have look for justification in perfect religious books like VEDAS. All Middle east religions except Judaism are just modification of existing knowledge. There is nothing new in terms of spirituality. Christianity and Islam are more like political parties, than tool for spiritual enlightenment. Just like political parties or a business firm they are thirsty to add more people to their fold.Just like Communist party in Kerala trying to get Jesus Christ into their fold. There is a kind of insecurity. Hinduism does not have to convince anything to the world. It is a well established and complete religion adaptable to any generation. How long the middle east religious books can hold without change is a big question. Bible keep changing the versions to adapt to the new world knowledge. Islam, trying to use force to stop people from asking questions. Without threat and force these religions do not have much future. Evolution theories and science are not acceptable to these religions but they have to accept and study them in the modern world. Earth is not flat it is round. The sky is not a wall with doors! So much things built on faulty foundation, just like communism!
raj nair
25/02/2012 04:09:11
Dr.G
Dr.G, you have the courage to tell the truth. Thank you.
a.k
24/02/2012 05:51:04
differnt ramanujan
THE ramanujan dr.gopalakrishnan is explaining about ramanujan who lived in the 11th century.Zakir naik told about A.K.RAMANUJAN who died in 1993.DR.gopalakrishnan sir,pls correct ur mistake
a.k
24/02/2012 05:47:24
doctor
@mathew,
What is that 3% of dr.gopalakrishnan.explain it.
Rajan
24/02/2012 00:21:06
SATHYAMEVA JAYATHE!
Absolutely true.This sinner & half baked doctor is spreading venom among gullible muslims.THAKKIYA=HOLY DECEPTION is approved in their book.And saudi oil money pouring in,his insanity goes unchecked.We need more Dr.Gopalakrishnans,more Agniveers and their ilk to eradicate this poisonous mind from BHARAT.
Vijayalakshmi
24/02/2012 00:05:01
Dr.GK on ZN.
It is very good that Dr.GK has said all this,because atleast some ignorant/gullible people may think that there may be some truth in what ZN says with so much of 'confidence'.Now they will understand the facts.
mathew
23/02/2012 06:50:12
Good speech.
This is a good speech. I agree with DR. Gopalakrishnan 97%. The 3% is for: sometimes the good doctor himself does not live by what he advises here... Given that a good speech with lots of substance.
kashinath
23/02/2012 04:41:13
HINDUSTHAN
NAMASTAHE,Sir,thanks for this response;this way of reaction in most needed.BHARATH MATHA KI JAI.
Dr. Kafir Naik
23/02/2012 03:57:21
Running away from debate with MP Arya
MP arya is inviting him for a debate from many years since 2004 but he is still running away from him
Suresh
23/02/2012 02:48:30
Dr. Naik
He is a fanatic working for a certain section of Wahabi-Muslims.
Please ignore him. He is breeding fanaticism all over the world with Gulf money.
Senthil Kumar
23/02/2012 02:25:19
Thank you ZN
After seeing a few of Zakir Naik's video clippings on youtube I have started reading more of Hindu scriptures. Thanks to Zakir Naik for his contribution on making Hindus like me to read more Hindu scriptures. It must be the leela of God himself to force Hindus to learn their own scriptures. Since most of us do not read them or try to know what is in them.
arjun
23/02/2012 02:04:00
Good reply
thanks HK good video...

zakir naik is just money making fraud ...his tv channel is banned in most of countries including Hindustan......
Sreenadh
22/02/2012 08:04:56
Truth
Thanks Sir You said the truth
Pradyumna
22/02/2012 06:47:40
Can you please post the translation?
menon
22/02/2012 03:57:53
Please
Dear Dr. Please do not waste your energy and time on this stooge. It will only help him glorify himself. ZN is just a wasted brain.
ayyankali
22/02/2012 03:49:53
DIFFERENT RAMANUJAN
SIR,the ramanajun u mentioned is different.zakir naik mentioned about a.k.ramanujan who wrote article about 300 ramayanas
ayyankali
22/02/2012 03:40:48
UNFAIR TREATMENT
I don't know why hk is not publishing my message.atleast send the reason to my email id



 

Feedback

All rights reserved. © 2005 - 2014. www.haindavakeralam.org